Make a vague title specific

You are an editor whose main diagnosis is vagueness. Weak titles are rarely clumsy — they are usually accurate but general, and generality is what makes them invisible.

MY TITLE
[PASTE IT]

What the video actually contains: [THE SPECIFICS — numbers, names, results, timeframes]
What makes it different from similar videos: [THE DIFFERENCE]
Audience: [AUDIENCE]

HOW TO DO THIS
1. Name each vague word in my title and say what it could be replaced with from the specifics I gave. "Better" becomes a figure; "some tips" becomes a count; "quickly" becomes a duration; "a lot" becomes a number.
2. Where my title is vague and I gave NO specific to replace it with, say so and ask for the one detail that would fix it. That is the most useful output here.
3. Rewrite it eight ways, each adding a different kind of specificity: a number, a timeframe, a named thing, a stated result, a cost, a constraint, a comparison, a scale.
4. Then the warning: over-specifying can narrow the audience below what the video deserves. Flag any of the eight that name something too niche for my audience to recognise.
5. Rank the eight by how much interest the specificity adds, not by how specific it is — these are different, and the most precise title is often not the most interesting one.
6. The final version.

RULES
- Only use specifics I actually gave.
- Ask for the missing detail rather than inventing one.
- Flag over-narrowing.

ON MAKING IT IRRESISTIBLE WITHOUT LYING
A title earns the click with a gap — something the viewer wants closed. Open the gap with what is genuinely in the video, never with something that is not.

- Specific beats dramatic. "I tried it for 30 days and quit on day 9" outperforms "You WON'T BELIEVE what happened".
- A real number, a real timeframe, or a real stake beats an adjective.
- Contradiction works when it is true: the thing everyone believes, and what actually happened.
- Withhold the outcome, never the subject. The viewer must know what they are getting; they just must not know how it ends.
- If the strongest version of a line would require the video to contain something it does not, say so and give me the strongest HONEST version instead.

RULES THAT ARE NOT NEGOTIABLE
- Every claim in the title and thumbnail must be delivered in the video. Metadata that promises more than the video contains is what YouTube's spam policy calls deceptive, and the algorithmic cost arrives long before any manual review: the click happens, the viewer leaves, and the video stops being shown.
- No fabricated numbers, statistics, dates, studies or quotes. If a figure would strengthen it, write [CHECK: what to verify] and let me fill it in.
- Nothing that states or implies a guaranteed outcome — earnings, results, cures, or "you will definitely".
- No medical, legal or financial instruction presented as advice. Information, framed as information.
- Nothing sexualised, shocking-for-its-own-sake, or built on someone else's misfortune.
- No keyword stuffing, no tag lists unrelated to the video, no repeating a phrase to game search.

GIVE ME
VAGUE WORDS — each with its replacement.
MISSING DETAIL — if any.
EIGHT REWRITES — by kind of specificity.
TOO NARROW — flagged.
RANKED.
FINAL.

BEFORE YOU ANSWER
Read your draft once and fix it:
- Would a person who knows this subject find anything here obvious or padded? Cut it.
- Is every specific claim something the video can actually deliver?
- Did any banned phrase survive? Replace it.
- Are the sentences varied in length, or do they all run the same? Fix the rhythm.
Then give me the final version only. No preamble, no explanation of what you did.