The gap between what is taught and what happens
Every field has a gap between the tidy version taught to beginners and what practitioners actually do. That gap is where the most valuable videos live, because nobody with the experience to see it bothers to make them. This maps it for your niche.
Siapkan ini
- NICHE
- WHAT YOU HAVE DONE, HOW LONG
- THE TEXTBOOK VERSION
- YOUR EXPERIENCE
- NEED: ...
Prompt
You are a practitioner-researcher. You look for the gap between the tidy account taught to beginners and what people who do this daily actually do — the richest source of video ideas there is, and the one that only someone with real experience can mine. MY NICHE Subject: [NICHE] My actual experience: [WHAT YOU HAVE DONE, HOW LONG] What the standard advice says: [THE TEXTBOOK VERSION] What you have found to be different in practice: [YOUR EXPERIENCE] HOW TO DO THIS 1. From what I told you, list where the standard advice and practice diverge. Look for these shapes specifically: - Advice that is correct but useless without something nobody mentions - The step everyone skips and nobody admits to skipping - The tool or method everyone recommends and few actually use - The rule that only applies under conditions rarely stated - The thing beginners are told not to worry about that turns out to matter most 2. For each, give me the video: the title, the claim, and the specific evidence from MY experience that supports it. If a gap depends on experience I did not describe, mark it [NEED: ...] and say what to supply. 3. Rate each on how CONTENTIOUS it is. A mild disagreement is a weak video; a real one where I can defend the position is a strong one. Say which I should be ready to argue for in the comments. 4. Warn me about any where the standard advice exists for a safety, legal or financial reason. Those are gaps to explain carefully, not to contradict. RULES - Build only on the experience I described. Do not invent practitioner knowledge. - If a gap relates to health, money or safety, say so and frame the video as nuance rather than contradiction. - A contrarian take with no evidence behind it is worse than no video. Say when I do not have the receipts. ON MAKING IT IRRESISTIBLE WITHOUT LYING A title earns the click with a gap — something the viewer wants closed. Open the gap with what is genuinely in the video, never with something that is not. - Specific beats dramatic. "I tried it for 30 days and quit on day 9" outperforms "You WON'T BELIEVE what happened". - A real number, a real timeframe, or a real stake beats an adjective. - Contradiction works when it is true: the thing everyone believes, and what actually happened. - Withhold the outcome, never the subject. The viewer must know what they are getting; they just must not know how it ends. - If the strongest version of a line would require the video to contain something it does not, say so and give me the strongest HONEST version instead. RULES THAT ARE NOT NEGOTIABLE - Every claim in the title and thumbnail must be delivered in the video. Metadata that promises more than the video contains is what YouTube's spam policy calls deceptive, and the algorithmic cost arrives long before any manual review: the click happens, the viewer leaves, and the video stops being shown. - No fabricated numbers, statistics, dates, studies or quotes. If a figure would strengthen it, write [CHECK: what to verify] and let me fill it in. - Nothing that states or implies a guaranteed outcome — earnings, results, cures, or "you will definitely". - No medical, legal or financial instruction presented as advice. Information, framed as information. - Nothing sexualised, shocking-for-its-own-sake, or built on someone else's misfortune. - No keyword stuffing, no tag lists unrelated to the video, no repeating a phrase to game search. GIVE ME THE GAPS — each with a title, the claim, my evidence, and a contention rating. NEED FROM YOU — what is missing. BE CAREFUL WITH — anything where the standard advice has a safety reason. BEFORE YOU ANSWER Read your draft once and fix it: - Would a person who knows this subject find anything here obvious or padded? Cut it. - Is every specific claim something the video can actually deliver? - Did any banned phrase survive? Replace it. - Are the sentences varied in length, or do they all run the same? Fix the rhythm. Then give me the final version only. No preamble, no explanation of what you did.
Tag
Prompt terkait
Topics with a real reason to spread
Ideas judged by the specific mechanism that would make someone share them.
Mine the questions people keep asking
Turns the recurring questions in a niche into videos, sorted by urgency.
Turn your comments into your next videos
Reads a comment section for the requests, confusions and disagreements worth a video.
What just changed in this niche
Finds the recent changes worth covering, and marks what you must verify first.
Turn one idea into a series
Expands a single video idea into a connected run that builds an audience.
Borrow a format from another niche
Takes a format that works elsewhere on YouTube and adapts it to your subject.