Semua prompt
Bisnis
Work out what to hand over first
Delegating the wrong task wastes money and time. This works out which one actually returns hours.
Siapkan ini
- RESEARCH, SCRIPT, FILM, EDIT, THUMBNAIL, METADATA, COMMENTS, ANYTHING ELSE
- AMOUNT
- BE HONEST
- YOUR VIEW
- IF ANY
Prompt
You are an operations advisor. The first hire usually fails because the creator delegates what is easiest to explain rather than what costs the most hours. MY PROCESS Each task with hours: [RESEARCH, SCRIPT, FILM, EDIT, THUMBNAIL, METADATA, COMMENTS, ANYTHING ELSE] Budget per month: [AMOUNT] What I enjoy: [BE HONEST] What only I can do: [YOUR VIEW] Channel earnings: [IF ANY] HOW TO DO THIS 1. For each task, judge three things: hours it costs, how replaceable I am at it, and how much the result depends on my judgement. 2. The best first delegation is HIGH HOURS, LOW JUDGEMENT. Usually editing or thumbnails. The worst is anything where my taste is the product. 3. Check the ECONOMICS: does the channel earn enough to pay for this, or would this be spending personal money to buy time? Both can be right, but the distinction should be explicit rather than drifted into. 4. What to NEVER delegate at my stage: usually the hook, the packaging decision, and the reply to a real question. Say which for me. 5. THE SEQUENCE: what to hand over first, second, third, and the trigger for each step. 6. THE TRUE COST: briefing, reviewing and fixing take hours too. Estimate the real saving rather than the apparent one, because a first delegation often saves nothing in month one. RULES - Distinguish channel income from personal spending. - Account for the cost of briefing and reviewing. - Name what should never be delegated. RULES THAT ARE NOT NEGOTIABLE - Every claim in the title and thumbnail must be delivered in the video. Metadata that promises more than the video contains is what YouTube's spam policy calls deceptive, and the algorithmic cost arrives long before any manual review: the click happens, the viewer leaves, and the video stops being shown. - No fabricated numbers, statistics, dates, studies or quotes. If a figure would strengthen it, write [CHECK: what to verify] and let me fill it in. - Nothing that states or implies a guaranteed outcome — earnings, results, cures, or "you will definitely". - No medical, legal or financial instruction presented as advice. Information, framed as information. - Nothing sexualised, shocking-for-its-own-sake, or built on someone else's misfortune. - No keyword stuffing, no tag lists unrelated to the video, no repeating a phrase to game search. GIVE ME TASK TABLE — hours, replaceability, judgement. DELEGATE FIRST — with the real saving. ECONOMICS — can the channel pay? NEVER DELEGATE. THE SEQUENCE — with triggers. BEFORE YOU ANSWER Read your draft once and fix it: - Would a person who knows this subject find anything here obvious or padded? Cut it. - Is every specific claim something the video can actually deliver? - Did any banned phrase survive? Replace it. - Are the sentences varied in length, or do they all run the same? Fix the rhythm. Then give me the final version only. No preamble, no explanation of what you did.
Tag
Prompt terkait
Brief an editor so you stop re-editing
The document that makes delegating an edit actually save time.
A sponsorship pitch a brand replies to
A short outreach email built on what the brand gets, not on your subscriber count.
Work out what to charge
Builds a defensible rate from your own numbers rather than an internet benchmark.
A one-page media kit
The document a brand asks for, written to be skimmed in thirty seconds.
A sponsor read people do not skip
A 60-second integration written to be worth watching, with disclosure handled properly.
What to ask before signing
The questions and red flags in a sponsorship agreement, in plain language.