सभी प्रॉम्प्ट
हुक और शुरुआत
Rewrite just the first sentence
One sentence, twelve ways. Cheap to change and the highest-leverage edit available in most scripts.
यह तैयार रखें
- PASTE IT
- TOPIC
- THE PAYOFF
- AUDIENCE
प्रॉम्प्ट
You are an editor who works on single sentences. The first one is the highest-leverage line in a script and usually the least revised. MY CURRENT FIRST SENTENCE [PASTE IT] What the video is about: [TOPIC] The payoff: [THE PAYOFF] Audience: [AUDIENCE] HOW TO DO THIS 1. Say what is wrong with mine, specifically. Usually one of: it explains, it greets, it is abstract, it is about the video rather than about the subject, or it takes too long to reach a noun that matters. 2. Twelve rewrites. Each under 15 words. Use a different mechanism each time: a statement of fact, a number, a contradiction, a confession, an instruction, a question, a mid-action fragment, a named consequence, a comparison, a warning, a direct address, and the plainest possible version. 3. Mark which need a specific OPENING SHOT to work, since some only land over an image. 4. Rank by how well each survives being heard with no context, which is the condition every opening is actually heard in. 5. Give the SECOND SENTENCE for the top three. A strong first line followed by a weak second wastes it. RULES - Under 15 words. Count them. - No greeting, no channel name, no "in this video". - Must be true of the video. ON MAKING IT IRRESISTIBLE WITHOUT LYING A title earns the click with a gap — something the viewer wants closed. Open the gap with what is genuinely in the video, never with something that is not. - Specific beats dramatic. "I tried it for 30 days and quit on day 9" outperforms "You WON'T BELIEVE what happened". - A real number, a real timeframe, or a real stake beats an adjective. - Contradiction works when it is true: the thing everyone believes, and what actually happened. - Withhold the outcome, never the subject. The viewer must know what they are getting; they just must not know how it ends. - If the strongest version of a line would require the video to contain something it does not, say so and give me the strongest HONEST version instead. RULES THAT ARE NOT NEGOTIABLE - Every claim in the title and thumbnail must be delivered in the video. Metadata that promises more than the video contains is what YouTube's spam policy calls deceptive, and the algorithmic cost arrives long before any manual review: the click happens, the viewer leaves, and the video stops being shown. - No fabricated numbers, statistics, dates, studies or quotes. If a figure would strengthen it, write [CHECK: what to verify] and let me fill it in. - Nothing that states or implies a guaranteed outcome — earnings, results, cures, or "you will definitely". - No medical, legal or financial instruction presented as advice. Information, framed as information. - Nothing sexualised, shocking-for-its-own-sake, or built on someone else's misfortune. - No keyword stuffing, no tag lists unrelated to the video, no repeating a phrase to game search. HOW IT MUST SOUND Write it the way a person talks on camera, not the way an article reads. - Vary sentence length hard. Follow a 20-word sentence with a three-word one. Evenly-sized sentences are the single clearest sign of machine writing. - Use contractions. Say "you'll", not "you will". - Address one person as "you". Never "viewers", never "we" when you mean them. - Cut every throat-clearing phrase. Start on the point. - Never use: delve, tapestry, testament, realm, navigate the landscape, in today's fast-paced world, unlock, unleash, elevate, game-changer, dive deep, it's worth noting, furthermore, moreover, in conclusion, embark, harness, seamless, robust, leverage (as a verb), "let's explore", "buckle up". - No sentence may begin with "In this video" or "Welcome back to the channel". - Do not hedge. "This works" beats "this can potentially help". - No emoji unless I ask for them. GIVE ME WHAT IS WRONG — specific. TWELVE LINES — with word count and mechanism. TOP THREE — with their second sentence. BEFORE YOU ANSWER Read your draft once and fix it: - Would a person who knows this subject find anything here obvious or padded? Cut it. - Is every specific claim something the video can actually deliver? - Did any banned phrase survive? Replace it. - Are the sentences varied in length, or do they all run the same? Fix the rhythm. Then give me the final version only. No preamble, no explanation of what you did.
टैग
संबंधित प्रॉम्प्ट
Five openings, five techniques
Five different 20-second openings for the same video, each using a distinct method.
The first three seconds, on their own
Ten opening lines built to survive the moment a viewer decides to stay or swipe.
Write a cold open
An opening that starts mid-action and explains nothing for fifteen seconds.
An opening for someone who searched
A first thirty seconds built for a viewer who came with a specific question.
Openings built on a question
Ten opening questions that are worth answering rather than rhetorical.
Open with an image rather than a sentence
Openings where the first thing that happens is visual, not spoken.