Tags, comma-separated and ready to paste
Tags matter far less than they did, and they still help YouTube place a video whose title is ambiguous or whose subject has several names. This produces one pasteable line, ordered most important first, kept under the 500-character limit, with nothing irrelevant — because unrelated tags are what YouTube’s spam policy names, and they dilute the ones that count.
यह तैयार रखें
- TITLE
- TOPIC
- MAIN POINTS
- NICHE
प्रॉम्प्ट
You are a YouTube metadata specialist. You are realistic about tags: they are a minor ranking signal now, they still help disambiguate a subject that goes by several names, and stuffing them with unrelated terms is a policy violation that also dilutes the ones that work. MY VIDEO Title: [TITLE] Topic: [TOPIC] What it covers: [MAIN POINTS] Niche: [NICHE] HOW TO DO THIS Produce ONE comma-separated line I can paste straight into the tag field, ordered by importance — YouTube weights the earliest tags most. Build it in this order: 1. The exact title phrase, or the closest natural phrasing of it 2. The primary keyword 3. 3-5 close variants and synonyms, including any other name this subject goes by 4. 3-5 long-tail phrases a person would actually search 5. 2-3 broad category terms for the niche 6. My channel name, if I gave you one Keep the whole line under 500 characters — that is the field limit, and tags past it are simply discarded. Count it and tell me the count. Then, separately, list any tag you considered and REJECTED for being irrelevant, so I can see the line held to a standard. RULES - Every tag must be genuinely about this video. No trending terms bolted on, no competitor channel names, no celebrity names who are not in it. - No single-word tags so broad they describe nothing: "video", "youtube", "viral", "trending". - Lower case throughout. Capitalisation gains nothing and looks untidy when it appears in listings. - No duplicates and no near-duplicates that differ by a plural. RULES THAT ARE NOT NEGOTIABLE - Every claim in the title and thumbnail must be delivered in the video. Metadata that promises more than the video contains is what YouTube's spam policy calls deceptive, and the algorithmic cost arrives long before any manual review: the click happens, the viewer leaves, and the video stops being shown. - No fabricated numbers, statistics, dates, studies or quotes. If a figure would strengthen it, write [CHECK: what to verify] and let me fill it in. - Nothing that states or implies a guaranteed outcome — earnings, results, cures, or "you will definitely". - No medical, legal or financial instruction presented as advice. Information, framed as information. - Nothing sexualised, shocking-for-its-own-sake, or built on someone else's misfortune. - No keyword stuffing, no tag lists unrelated to the video, no repeating a phrase to game search. GIVE ME TAGS (ready to paste): one, single, line, like, this CHARACTER COUNT: [number] of 500 REJECTED: [tags you left out, and the one-line reason] BEFORE YOU ANSWER Read your draft once and fix it: - Would a person who knows this subject find anything here obvious or padded? Cut it. - Is every specific claim something the video can actually deliver? - Did any banned phrase survive? Replace it. - Are the sentences varied in length, or do they all run the same? Fix the rhythm. Then give me the final version only. No preamble, no explanation of what you did.
टैग
संबंधित प्रॉम्प्ट
Complete metadata set for one upload
Title, description, tags, chapters and pinned comment, written to work together.
Keyword map for one video
Primary, secondary and long-tail keywords for a single video, sorted by what you can win.
What the searcher actually wants
Takes one search phrase apart: who types it, what they really want, and what a winning video contains.
Keywords for the channel itself
The phrases your whole channel should own, plus the about-section text built from them.
Say the keywords out loud
Where to speak your keywords in the script, since YouTube indexes the transcript.
The gap in what already ranks
Works out what the top videos on a term fail to deliver, and what yours must do differently.